AR · Solar

Solar quotes in Rogers, AR.

One real quote from a vetted local Rogers installer, sized to your roof, your bill, and every federal + state rebate you qualify for.

One vetted local installer · no lead list

What you get

One vetted local Rogers installer
Rebates checked for your exact address
No call-center spam, no lead list

7.5 kW
Average system size: $2.80/W
Average cost (USD): 11 yrs
Average payback: 55+
Local installers

Why solar in Rogers

With no tax credits left at either level, a Rogers solar system is worth production multiplied by rate and nothing else. Act 278 helpfully requires the proposal to state expected monthly and annual output and annual degradation, which means the two numbers most worth checking should already be on the page. What the statute does not do is check them for you.

The statute puts the numbers in front of you

Act 278 requires a proposal to include the nameplate generating capacity and the expected monthly and annual output, plus annual degradation estimates.

That is more than most states require, and it means an Arkansas buyer starts with the production figure written down rather than having to extract it.

It also means an internally inconsistent proposal is easy to spot. A stated annual degradation figure and a savings model holding production flat for twenty-five years cannot both be right.

Ask which of the two the savings projection actually used. If the model ignores the degradation the proposal states, the back half of the projection is overstated.

Checking the production figure itself

Ask what data source produced it and whether it applies location-specific irradiance for your address rather than a regional average.

Ask what shading analysis was done and what it assumed about tree growth over the system life. North-west Arkansas lots are frequently wooded and a model built on today canopy will overstate output in ten years.

Ask what module temperature the estimate assumed and what temperature coefficient it applied. Panels lose efficiency as they heat, and an Arkansas summer is exactly the condition where a generic model overstates output.

Ask what soiling losses it applied. A model assuming none is describing a cleaner environment than the one your panels will sit in.

And the rate on the other side

Ask which retail rate the projection used and check it against a recent bill. Arkansas averages around 14.2 cents per kWh, but your own rate is the one that matters.

Ask whether fixed monthly charges were included, since they do not fall when consumption does, and ask how the model treated exports, which earn avoided cost rather than retail.

Act 278 requires forecast monthly and annual bill savings in dollars, so that figure should be stated. Ask what rate and what export assumption produced it.

Ask what escalation the projection applied and to see it at zero. With no incentives left, the escalator is the only other lever a quote can pull to make the numbers look better.

What the number should be built from

Strike the federal residential credit from any quote showing it, and do not expect a state credit in its place, because Arkansas has none.

Rebuild from full retail value for self-consumed generation, avoided cost for exports under the non-legacy schedule, and the electricity you stop buying at your actual rate.

Ask your county assessor how residential solar is treated for property assessment at your address, since that is administered locally.

Then use the five business days Act 278 gives you to check the stated output, degradation, cost, payback and savings figures against each other. An internally inconsistent proposal is the easiest kind of problem to catch.

Incentives & rebates

Net metering: Non-legacy schedule at avoided cost; pre-Sept-2024 grandfathered

Arkansas net metering changed under Act 278 of 2023, and the pivot is a date. Projects developed before September 30, 2024 were grandfathered at the one-to-one rate for a 20-year contract duration, which runs through September 2040. For those customers an exported kilowatt hour and a consumed one remain worth the same, and nothing about the change affects them for the working life of the system. Customers interconnecting after September 30, 2024, with certain exceptions, take service under a non-legacy net metering schedule instead. Under it, generation consumed on site in real time offsets electricity you would have bought at the retail rate, which remains the most valuable outcome, while excess exported to the grid is compensated at avoided cost, a wholesale-style measure well below the roughly 14.2 cent Arkansas residential average. The utilities argued in support of the change that full retail credit shifted transmission, distribution and maintenance costs onto other customers. Whatever view you take of that, the practical consequence for a new system is the same: self-consumption is worth substantially more than export, so the design should be built from your daytime load rather than from your annual total, load shifting into daylight is free value, and storage carries more weight than the national conversation suggests. Arkansas is also served extensively by electric cooperatives and municipal utilities whose terms may differ, so confirm what applies at your address.

Related Arkansas resources

Arkansas solar incentives & rebates Full breakdown of federal, provincial, and utility programs.

How payback works in Arkansas

System cost: $21,000
Estimated net cost: $21,000
Estimated payback: ~13.0 years
25-year net savings: ~$19,500

These figures are illustrative; your actual quote reflects your roof, sun exposure, and local utility rates.

Frequently asked questions

Should the proposal already state expected output?

Yes. Act 278 requires the nameplate generating capacity, expected monthly and annual output, and annual degradation estimates. That is more than most states require and it puts the key numbers in front of you.

How do I spot an inconsistent proposal?

Check the stated annual degradation against the savings model. A degradation figure and a projection holding production flat for twenty-five years cannot both be right, and the back half of such a projection is overstated.

What should I ask about the production estimate?

The data source and whether it uses location-specific irradiance for your address, what the shading analysis assumed about tree growth, what module temperature and coefficient it applied, and what soiling losses it included.

What should I check about the savings figure?

Act 278 requires forecast monthly and annual bill savings in dollars, so ask what retail rate and what export assumption produced it, whether fixed charges were included, and what escalation was applied. Ask to see it at zero escalation.